These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
280 related items for PubMed ID: 14967388
1. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial. Biacchiardi CP, Revelli A, Gennarelli G, Rustichelli S, Moffa F, Massobrio M. Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 14967388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Werbrouck E, Spiessens C, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. Fertil Steril; 2006 Sep; 86(3):566-71. PubMed ID: 16952506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study. Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, Guler I. Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2508-13. PubMed ID: 18692788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility. Cantineau AE, Cohlen BJ, Al-Inany H, Heineman MJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Jun; (3):CD001502. PubMed ID: 15266448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study. Mamas L. Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 16500346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility. Ricci G, Nucera G, Pozzobon C, Boscolo R, Giolo E, Guaschino S. Fertil Steril; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 11730758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Lande Y, Fisch B. Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Gregoriou O, Vlahos NF, Konidaris S, Papadias K, Botsis D, Creatsas GK. Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 17961561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of the hemizona assay for pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination. Arslan M, Morshedi M, Arslan EO, Taylor S, Kanik A, Duran HE, Oehninger S. Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1697-707. PubMed ID: 16682031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. Grigoriou O, Makrakis E, Konidaris S, Hassiakos D, Papadias K, Baka S, Creatsas G. Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):618-21. PubMed ID: 15749490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of clinical efficacy of three different insemination techniques in couple infertility. A randomized study. Noci I, Dabizzi S, Evangelisti P, Cozzi C, Cameron Smith M, Criscuoli L, Fuzzi B, Branconi F. Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Feb; 59(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17353869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility. Cantineau AE, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ, Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct 30; (10):CD001502. PubMed ID: 24174382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation. Custers IM, König TE, Broekmans FJ, Hompes PG, Kaaijk E, Oosterhuis J, Mochtar MH, Repping S, van Wely M, Steures P, van der Veen F, Mol BW. Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov 30; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of daily and alternate day recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination. Kabli N, Sylvestre C, Tulandi T, Buckett W. Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr 30; 91(4):1141-4. PubMed ID: 18342857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation for treatment of infertility: an audit of a new IUI programme in a low resource setting. Ikechebelu JI, Okeke CA. J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jan 30; 27(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 17365462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the treatment of subfertility. Sikandar R, Virk S, Lakhani S, Sahab H, Rizvi J. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Dec 30; 15(12):782-5. PubMed ID: 16398971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Kahn JA, Sunde A, Koskemies A, von Düring V, Sørdal T, Christensen F, Molne K. Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun 30; 8(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 8345080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen. Ng EH, Makkar G, Yeung WS, Ho PC. J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul 30; 48(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 12953328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility. Shekhawat GS. Med J Armed Forces India; 2012 Jul 30; 68(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 24532873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]