These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 14969176

  • 1. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
    Sass MA.
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
    Fremont-Smith M, Marino J, Griffin B, Spencer L, Bolick D.
    Cancer; 2004 Oct 25; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
    Marino JF, Fremont-Smith M.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr 25; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A, Maeda MY, Erzen M, Branca M, Roteli-Martins C, Naud P, Derchain SF, Hammes L, Matos J, Gontijo R, Sarian LO, Lima TP, Tatti S, Syrjänen S, Syrjänen K.
    Acta Cytol; 2005 Apr 25; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
    Sodhani P, Gupta S, Singh V, Sehgal A, Mitra AB.
    Acta Cytol; 2004 Apr 25; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Studeman KD, Ioffe OB, Puszkiewicz J, Sauvegeot J, Henry MR.
    Acta Cytol; 2003 Apr 25; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L, Chatelain P, Mottot C.
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb 02; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
    Vassilakos P, Saurel J, Rondez R.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Feb 02; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Unsatisfactory SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou tests: causes and significance.
    Alsharif M, McKeon DM, Gulbahce HE, Savik K, Pambuccian SE.
    Cancer; 2009 Feb 25; 117(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 19347825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
    Bentz JS.
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov 25; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
    Cox JT.
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov 25; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of continuous monitoring of cytologic-histologic correlation data on cervical cancer screening performance.
    Raab SS, Jones BA, Souers R, Tworek JA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan 25; 132(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 18181668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K.
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug 25; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
    Tench W.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov 25; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Pitman MB, Cibas ES, Powers CN, Renshaw AA, Frable WJ.
    Cancer; 2002 Jun 25; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
    Hessling JJ, Raso DS, Schiffer B, Callicott J, Husain M, Taylor D.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct 25; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Glandular Cell Abnormalities on SurePath Preparations: A Retrospective Review with Cytology-Histology Correlations.
    Fischer G, Cormier K.
    Acta Cytol; 2018 Oct 25; 62(5-6):423-429. PubMed ID: 30244241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effectiveness of the SurePath liquid-based Pap test in automated screening and in detection of HSIL.
    Cengel KA, Day SJ, Davis-Devine S, Adams CL, Madison-Henness D, Hartman ME, Freund GG.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Nov 25; 29(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 14595790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.