These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

372 related items for PubMed ID: 14979824

  • 1. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M, Custers R, Brysbaert M.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL, Puglisi JT.
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.
    Marí-Beffa P, Valdés B, Cullen DJ, Catena A, Houghton G.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.
    Allen PA, Bucur B, Grabbe J, Work T, Madden DJ.
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 21534029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Automatic processing of word meaning: intralingual and interlingual interference.
    Goodman GS, Haith MM, Guttentag RE, Rao S.
    Child Dev; 1985 Feb; 56(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 3987396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
    Klepousniotou E, Titone D, Romero C.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ, Costa A, Peterson R, Vargas KA, Caramazza A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK, Nicholls ME, Kwantes PJ, Castles A.
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J, Perea M.
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A, Davis C, Savage G, Castles A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Kouchi S, Lachter J.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S, Strack F.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.