These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 14994296
1. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages. McGee KP, Debbins JP, Boskamp EB, Blawat L, Angelos L, King KF. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Mar; 19(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14994296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Klumpp B, Fenchel M, Hoevelborn T, Helber U, Scheule A, Claussen C, Miller S. Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain tumor enhancement in MR imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison of SNR and CNR gain using TSE and GRE techniques. Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Biswas J, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Invest Radiol; 2007 Aug; 42(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 17620938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla. Ruan C, Yang SH, Cusi K, Gao F, Clarke GD. Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 17507805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - initial experience. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Grothoff M, Freyhardt P, Schwinge K, Plotkin M, Amthauer H, Noeske R, Felix R. Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 15173972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison. Koktzoglou I, Chung YC, Mani V, Carroll TJ, Morasch MD, Mizsei G, Simonetti OP, Fayad ZA, Li D. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 16555260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER). Fries P, Runge VM, Kirchin MA, Stemmer A, Naul LG, Wiliams KD, Reith W, Bücker A, Schneider G. Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRI of the lung at 3 Tesla using parallel imaging with 32-receiver channel technology. Henzler T, Dietrich O, Krissak R, Wichmann T, Lanz T, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 19711408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems. Hinton DP, Wald LL, Pitts J, Schmitt F. Invest Radiol; 2003 Jul; 38(7):436-42. PubMed ID: 12821858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved SNR in linear reordered 2D bSSFP imaging using variable flip angles. Paul D, Zaitsev M. Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):933-41. PubMed ID: 19286338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla. Martirosian P, Boss A, Deimling M, Kiefer B, Schraml C, Schwenzer NF, Claussen CD, Schick F. Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18097273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, Pope W, Laub G, Finn JP, Villablanca JP. Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience. Scarabino T, Giannatempo GM, Popolizio T, Tosetti M, d'Alesio V, Esposito F, Di Salle F, Di Costanzo A, Bertolino A, Maggialetti A, Salvolini U. Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla. Kramer H, Michaely HJ, Matschl V, Schmitt P, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 17507821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiac MR tagging: optimization of sequence parameters and comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in a volunteer study]. Kramer U, Deshpande V, Fenchel M, Klumpp B, Laub G, Finn JP, Claussen CD, Miller S. Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 16586309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three accelerated pulse sequences for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE). Weber S, Kronfeld A, Kunz RP, Fiebich M, Horstick G, Kreitner KF, Schreiber WG. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):569-79. PubMed ID: 17685447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel imaging with 3D TPI trajectory: SNR and acceleration benefits. Qian Y, Stenger VA, Boada FE. Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 27(5):656-63. PubMed ID: 19110392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM, Delong DM, Nelson RC. Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent. Nael K, Fenchel M, Krishnam M, Finn JP, Laub G, Ruehm SG. Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 17507810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]