These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

394 related items for PubMed ID: 14994890

  • 1. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
    Cash A, Curtis R, Garrigia-Majo D, McDonald F.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
    Vaughan JL, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ, Eadie RL, Faulkner MG, Glover KE, Prasad NG, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV, Padmanabhan R, Janardhanam P.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Dec; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23678999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A, McCabe JF, Gordon PH.
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7786865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
    Krishnan M, Kalathil S, Abraham KM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.