These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 14999752

  • 1. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices.
    Reich SM, Petschelt A, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R.
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Apr 01; 69(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 14999752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR).
    Ellakwa A, Shortall A, Shehata M, Marquis P.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Apr 01; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composites used for fabricating FPDs.
    Nakamura T, Waki T, Kinuta S, Tanaka H.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Apr 01; 16(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 14651244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite.
    Freiberg RS, Ferracane JL.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct 01; 11(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 10388379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH, Kim SS, Cho YS, Lee CK, Noh BD.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Oct 01; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov 01; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul 01; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Shear bond strength evaluation of different veneering systems on Ni-Cr alloys.
    Ciftçi Y, Canay S, Hersek N.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Jul 01; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17244305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials.
    Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun 01; 25(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 7938432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Jun 01; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct 01; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.