These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

320 related items for PubMed ID: 15003771

  • 1. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T, Haueisen J, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A, Nakasato N, Fujiwara S, Yoshimoto T.
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP, Shiao AS, Chen LF, Niddam DM, Chang SY, Lien CF, Lee SK, Hsieh JC.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Priority of repetitive adaptation to mismatch response following undiscriminable auditory stimulation: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Hoshiyama M, Okamoto H, Kakigi R.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 25(3):854-62. PubMed ID: 17328780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H.
    Neuropsychologia; 2004 Feb; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH, Hsu WY, Shih YH, Lin HC, Liao KK, Wu ZA, Lin YY.
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep 01; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Measurements of auditory and somatically evoked magnetic fields and localization of their dipole sources.
    Kuriki S, Isobe Y, Mizutani Y.
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1989 Sep 01; 1(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 2486751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T, Haueisen J, Sauer H.
    Brain Topogr; 2002 Sep 01; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians.
    Lütkenhöner B, Seither-Preisler A, Seither S.
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr 15; 30(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16337814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.