These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

547 related items for PubMed ID: 15008339

  • 21. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
    Smales RJ, Ng KK.
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results.
    Demircia M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 11203809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results.
    Demirci M, Sancakli HS, Uysal O.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 17968599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. One-year clinical evaluation of two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in posterior permanent teeth.
    de Moura FR, Piva E, Lund RG, Palha B, Demarco FF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2004 Jun; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15293426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001 Feb; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results.
    Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA.
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Apr; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, García-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH.
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
    Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Apr; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.
    Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willershausen B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Sep; 7(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12898294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.