These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

547 related items for PubMed ID: 15008339

  • 41. A 24-month follow-up of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Reis A, Loguercio AD.
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 17024938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O.
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Are Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Lesions More Long-Lasting than Resin-based Composite Resins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Gomes OMM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2018 Oct; 20(5):435-452. PubMed ID: 30349908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE.
    Oper Dent; 1995 May 01; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B.
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug 01; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb 01; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb 01; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH.
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep 01; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
    de Carvalho LD, Gondo R, Lopes GC.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug 01; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study.
    Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec 01; 2(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 10388389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estrada BE, Brackett WW.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Dec 01; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years.
    Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Wilder AD, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug 01; 132(8):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11575019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations using "softstart-polymerization".
    Oberländer H, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Kopp A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1999 Jun 01; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10803112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: two-year results.
    Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Attar N.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jun 01; 32(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 17695602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Uysal O.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C, Rho YJ, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.