These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
124 related items for PubMed ID: 15027532
1. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns. Rogers TL, Allard TT. J Forensic Sci; 2004 Mar; 49(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 15027532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification). Christensen AM. J Forensic Sci; 2004 May; 49(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 15171154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology. Grivas CR, Komar DA. J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. Rogers TL. J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 15932077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. Williams BA, Rogers T. J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 16882212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony. Lesciotto KM. J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 25716577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Skull sutures: Changing morphology during preadolescent growth and its implications in forensic identification. Jayaprakash PT, Srinivasan GJ. Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun 10; 229(1-3):166.e1-13. PubMed ID: 23582744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical sutures as a means of identifying human remains. Shepherd KL, Walsh-Haney H, Coburn MU. J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan 10; 55(1):237-40. PubMed ID: 19925587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score. Krauss DA. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006 Jan 10; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Application of anthropometric methods in comparative identification based on monitoring recordings]. Kempińska A, Szydłowski L. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005 Jan 10; 55(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 15984114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anthropological and radiographic comparison of antemortem surgical records for identification of skeletal remains. Scott AL, Congram D, Sweet D, Fonseca S, Skinner M. J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan 10; 55(1):241-4. PubMed ID: 19818106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the reliability of frontal sinuses in positive identification. Christensen AM. J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan 10; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15830992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Classifications used by Australian forensic odontologists in identification reports. Higgins D, James H. J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Dec 10; 24(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 17175833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]