These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
253 related items for PubMed ID: 15035935
1. Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon. Shamoo AE, Moreno JD. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15035935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coercion and the SATURN study. Resnik DB. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs. Luna E. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards. Albrecht RR. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects. Kopelman LM. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Criticisms of SATURN mirror criticisms of any mandatory student drug-testing policy. Verma AC. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 15035951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A response to commentators on "Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon". Shamoo AE, Moreno JD. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):W29-30. PubMed ID: 15035937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Coercion, harm, and complicity in research integrated with mandatory public health programs. Buchanan T. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 15035954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinician's perspective. Gorton GE. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 15035949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Required "volunteers" for human investigations--just say no! Cohen PJ. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15035953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandatory drug testing of high school athletes: unethical evaluation, unethical policy. Louria D. Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 15035943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL. Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Active and passive consent: a comparison of actual research with children. Range L, Embry T, MacLeod T. Ethical Hum Sci Serv; 2001; 3(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 15278986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Drug testing athletes to prevent substance abuse: background and pilot study results of the SATURN (Student Athlete Testing Using Random Notification) study. Goldberg L, Elliot DL, MacKinnon DP, Moe E, Kuehl KS, Nohre L, Lockwood CM. J Adolesc Health; 2003 Jan; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12507797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical research with college athletes: some ethical issues. Davis DS. IRB; 1998 Jan; 20(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 11657085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]