These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ. Neuroimage; 2002 Feb; 15(2):353-72. PubMed ID: 11798271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ. J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces. Latinus M, Taylor MJ. J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16197686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related potentials to upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces: effects on encoding and recognition. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ, Lobaugh NJ. Psychophysiology; 2004 Jul; 41(4):643-53. PubMed ID: 15189487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study. Marzi T, Viggiano MP. Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered. Yovel G, Paller KA. Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):789-800. PubMed ID: 14980582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects. Latinus M, Taylor MJ. Brain Res; 2006 Dec 06; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. Thierry G, Pegna AJ, Dodds C, Roberts M, Basan S, Downing P. Neuroimage; 2006 Aug 15; 32(2):871-9. PubMed ID: 16750639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity? Itier RJ, Latinus M, Taylor MJ. Neuroimage; 2006 Jan 15; 29(2):667-76. PubMed ID: 16169749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment. Sadeh B, Yovel G. Neuroimage; 2010 Nov 01; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces. Martens U, Schweinberger SR, Kiefer M, Burton AM. Brain Res; 2006 Sep 13; 1109(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 16872582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study. Marzi T, Viggiano MP. Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec 13; 78(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 20797414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Wiese H, Schweinberger SR, Hansen K. Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct 13; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors. Nakashima T, Kaneko K, Goto Y, Abe T, Mitsudo T, Ogata K, Makinouchi A, Tobimatsu S. Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec 13; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Henson RN, Rylands A, Ross E, Vuilleumeir P, Rugg MD. Neuroimage; 2004 Apr 13; 21(4):1674-89. PubMed ID: 15050590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG. Itier RJ, Herdman AT, George N, Cheyne D, Taylor MJ. Brain Res; 2006 Oct 18; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]