These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

185 related items for PubMed ID: 15060914

  • 1. How to take an accurate, stress-free impression.
    Polan MA.
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 15060914
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S.
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992 Oct; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK, Volpato CÂ, Zani IM, Bottino MA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB, Hong HH, Tsai TP, Shen YF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments.
    Paquette JM, Sheets CG.
    Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW, Cheng AC, Khin NT, Lee H, Leong DJ.
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL, Sierraalta M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
    Raviv E, Hanna J, Raviv R, Harel-Raviv M.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
    Ayuso-Montero R, Martinez-Gomis J, Lujan-Climent M, Salsench J, Peraire M.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Impression technics in complete removable dentures].
    Domken O, Chichoyan F, Prapotnich R.
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001 Feb; 56(3):216-33. PubMed ID: 16193854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ensuring accuracy and predictability with double-arch impressions.
    Christensen GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Aug; 139(8):1123-5. PubMed ID: 18682627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.