These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 15062140

  • 1. Toward a dynamic real-time intraoperative permanent prostate brachytherapy methodology.
    Potters L, Calguaru E, Thornton KB, Jackson T, Huang D.
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 15062140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
    Potters L, Calugaru E, Jassal A, Presser J.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul 15; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
    Zelefsky MJ, Yamada Y, Cohen GN, Sharma N, Shippy AM, Fridman D, Zaider M.
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug 15; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: a dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases.
    Fuller DB, Jin H, Koziol JA, Feng AC.
    Brachytherapy; 2005 Aug 15; 4(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 16182221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Seed localization and TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion for intraoperative prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Su Y, Davis BJ, Furutani KM, Herman MG, Robb RA.
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Jan 15; 12(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 17364656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of intraoperative edema during transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy on computer-optimized and preimplant planning techniques.
    Yamada Y, Potters L, Zaider M, Cohen G, Venkatraman E, Zelefsky MJ.
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct 15; 26(5):e130-5. PubMed ID: 14528087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Initial comparison of inverse optimization, modified peripheral technique, and geometric optimization as real-time intraoperative computer planning options for permanent seed implantation of the prostate.
    Raben A, Sammons S, Sim S, Chen H, Hanlon A, Sarkar A, Donavanik V, Grebler A, Geltzeiler J, Benge B, Glick A, Jacob D, Koprowski P.
    Brachytherapy; 2007 Oct 15; 6(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 17991621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of CT- and radiograph-based post-implant dosimetry for transperineal 125I prostate brachytherapy using single seeds and a commercial treatment-planning software.
    Siebert FA, Kohr P, Kovács G.
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb 15; 182(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 16447016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
    Mangili P, Stea L, Cattani F, Lappi S, Giglioli F, Calamia E, Ziglio F, Martinelli R, Longobardi B.
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr 15; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Review of intraoperative imaging and planning techniques in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.
    Polo A, Salembier C, Venselaar J, Hoskin P, PROBATE group of the GEC ESTRO.
    Radiother Oncol; 2010 Jan 15; 94(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 20074822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
    Su Y, Davis BJ, Furutani KM, Herman MG, Robb RA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intraoperative conformal optimization for transperineal prostate implantation using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
    Zelefsky MJ, Cohen G, Zakian KL, Dyke J, Koutcher JA, Hricak H, Schwartz L, Zaider M.
    Cancer J; 2000 Jun 07; 6(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 11038145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Five-year outcome of intraoperative conformal permanent I-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Zelefsky MJ, Yamada Y, Cohen GN, Shippy A, Chan H, Fridman D, Zaider M.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan 01; 67(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17189063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
    Ali I, Algan O, Thompson S, Sindhwani P, Herman T, Cheng CY, Ahmad S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep 21; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
    Yan C, Huq MS, Heron DE, Beriwal S, Wynn RB.
    Brachytherapy; 2019 Sep 21; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of the precision of seeds deposited as loose seeds versus suture embedded seeds: a randomized trial.
    Kaplan ID, Meskell PM, Lieberfarb M, Saltzman B, Berg S, Holupka EJ.
    Brachytherapy; 2004 Sep 21; 3(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 15110307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
    Raben A, Chen H, Grebler A, Geltzeiler J, Geltzeiler M, Keselman I, Litvin S, Sim S, Hanlon A, Yang J.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec 01; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.