These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


212 related items for PubMed ID: 15069135

  • 21. Grading the loss of sensation in diabetic patients: A psychometric evaluation of the rotterdam diabetic foot study test battery.
    Rinkel WD, Rizopoulos D, Aziz MH, Van Neck JW, Cabezas MC, Coert JH.
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Oct; 58(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30028522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.
    Oyer DS, Saxon D, Shah A.
    Endocr Pract; 2007 Oct; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Identification of Optimal Foot Tactile Sensation Threshold for Detecting Fall Risk Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
    Yang F.
    Phys Ther; 2021 Aug 01; 101(8):. PubMed ID: 33914896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The Ipswich Touch Test: a simple and novel method to screen patients with diabetes at home for increased risk of foot ulceration.
    Sharma S, Kerry C, Atkins H, Rayman G.
    Diabet Med; 2014 Sep 01; 31(9):1100-3. PubMed ID: 24673517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Identification of patients at risk for diabetic foot: a comparison of standardized noninvasive testing with routine practice at community diabetes clinics.
    Jirkovská A, Boucek P, Wosková V, Bartos V, Skibová J.
    J Diabetes Complications; 2001 Sep 01; 15(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 11274901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Diabetic foot screening: new technology versus 10g monofilament.
    Spruce MC, Bowling FL.
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2012 Mar 01; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 22334598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reversal of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and new wound incidence: the role of MIRE.
    Powell MW, Carnegie DE, Burke TJ.
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2004 Mar 01; 17(6):295-300. PubMed ID: 15289717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
    Baker N.
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec 01; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Identifying diabetic patients at high risk for amputation.
    Umeh L, Wallhagen M, Nicoloff N.
    Nurse Pract; 1999 Aug 01; 24(8):56, 60, 63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 10479110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Screening patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a comparison between measurement of vibration perception threshold and 10-g monofilament test.
    Richard JL, Reilhes L, Buvry S, Goletto M, Faillie JL.
    Int Wound J; 2014 Apr 01; 11(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 22892021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Implementing a clinical assessment protocol for sensory and skeletal function in diabetic neuropathy patients at a university hospital in Brazil.
    Sacco Ide C, João SM, Alignani D, Ota DK, Sartor CD, Silveira LT, Gomes AA, Cronfli R, Bernik M.
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2005 Sep 01; 123(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 16358098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.