These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 1507128

  • 1. The effect of slot preparation length on the transverse strength of slot-retained restorations.
    McMaster DR, House RC, Anderson MH, Pelleu GB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 1507128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Apr; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations.
    Reel DC, Mitchell RJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Proximal Contact Repair of Complex Amalgam Restorations.
    Zguri MN, Casey JA, Jessup JP, Vandewalle KS.
    Oper Dent; 2017 Feb; 42(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 28080293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC, Garman TA, Pashley DH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC, Twiggs SW, Fairhurst CW, King GE.
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations.
    Covey D, Schulein TM, Kohout FJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Feb; 118(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 2918151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B, Arslan H, Yasa E, Akcay M, Hatirli H.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016 Feb; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations.
    Görücü J, Tiritoglu M, Ozgünaltay G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin.
    Eakle WS.
    J Dent Res; 1986 Feb; 65(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3511111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.