These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


345 related items for PubMed ID: 15072893

  • 1. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
    Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Dowell JM, Auge BK, Paulson DF, Dahm P.
    Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
    Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L, Robertson CN, Walther P, Albala D, Moul JW, Polascik TJ.
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Anderson JK, Murdock A, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y.
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y.
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Teichman JM, Reddy PK, Hulbert JC.
    Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Janoff DM, Parra RO.
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
    Boris RS, Kaul SA, Sarle RC, Stricker HJ.
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W, Hiraoka Y.
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
    Fitzsimons NJ, Sun LL, Dahm P, Moul JW, Madden J, Gan TJ, Freedland SJ.
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C, Jones J, Schmidt F, Hampel C, Brenner W, Thüroff JW, Melchior SW.
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
    Mirzapour K, de Geeter P, Löhmer H, Albers P.
    Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
    May M, Dorst M, May J, Hoschke B, Fahlenkamp D, Vogler H, Siegsmund M.
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW.
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.