These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

230 related items for PubMed ID: 15080352

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Effects of an antimicrobial additive to toothbrushes on residual periodontal pathogens.
    Goldschmidt MC, Warren DP, Keene HJ, Tate WH, Gowda C.
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):66-70. PubMed ID: 15688961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. A quantitative approach to the effectiveness of ozone against microbiota organisms colonizing toothbrushes.
    Bezirtzoglou E, Cretoiu SM, Moldoveanu M, Alexopoulos A, Lazar V, Nakou M.
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):600-5. PubMed ID: 18502558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. An in vitro comparison of dentifrice formulations in three distinct oral microbiotas.
    Ledder RG, McBain AJ.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 21903197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.
    Turner LA, McCombs GB, Hynes WL, Tolle SL.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 19832909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
    Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP, Lewis BD, Brown KR, Towne JB.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Antimicrobial effects of a bioactive glass combined with fluoride or triclosan on Streptococcus mutans biofilm.
    Xu YT, Wu Q, Chen YM, Smales RJ, Shi SY, Wang MT.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 25951616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The immediate antimicrobial effect of a toothbrush and miswak on cariogenic bacteria: a clinical study.
    Almas K, Al-Zeid Z.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Feb 15; 5(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 14973564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial toothbrushes.
    Hamal JD, Hensley DM, Maller SC, Palazzolo DJ, Vandewalle KS.
    Gen Dent; 2014 Feb 15; 62(6):e24-7. PubMed ID: 25369397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP, Zanin IC, Lima JP, Vasconcelos SM, Melo MA, Beltrão HC, Rodrigues LK.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan 15; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.