These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


157 related items for PubMed ID: 15081160

  • 1. Validation of turbulence models in heavy gas dispersion over obstacles.
    Sklavounos S, Rigas F.
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Apr 30; 108(1-2):9-20. PubMed ID: 15081160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hazardous gas dispersion: a CFD model accounting for atmospheric stability classes.
    Pontiggia M, Derudi M, Busini V, Rota R.
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Nov 15; 171(1-3):739-47. PubMed ID: 19619939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On the application of computational fluid dynamics codes for liquefied natural gas dispersion.
    Luketa-Hanlin A, Koopman RP, Ermak DL.
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Feb 20; 140(3):504-17. PubMed ID: 17113710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Modelling the dispersion of flashing jets using CFD.
    Calay RK, Holdo AE.
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun 15; 154(1-3):1198-209. PubMed ID: 18162306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of OpenFoam for heavy gas dispersion applications.
    Mack A, Spruijt MP.
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov 15; 262():504-16. PubMed ID: 24076574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Estimation of vulnerable zones due to accidental release of toxic materials resulting in dense gas clouds.
    Singh MP, Mohan M, Panwar TS, Chopra HV.
    Risk Anal; 1991 Sep 15; 11(3):425-40. PubMed ID: 1947349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experimental study on flow and gaseous diffusion behind an isolated building.
    Yassin MF, Ohba M, Tanaka H.
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Dec 15; 147(1-3):149-58. PubMed ID: 18193336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predicting gaseous pollutant dispersion around a workplace.
    Guerra D, Ricciardi L, Laborde JC, Domenech S.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug 15; 4(8):619-33. PubMed ID: 17577751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Experimentally validated 3-D simulation of shock waves generated by dense explosives in confined complex geometries.
    Rigas F, Sklavounos S.
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 May 20; 121(1-3):23-30. PubMed ID: 15885402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments.
    Middha P, Hansen OR, Grune J, Kotchourko A.
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jul 15; 179(1-3):84-94. PubMed ID: 20346585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The development of a 3D risk analysis method.
    I YP, Cheng TL.
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May 01; 153(1-2):600-8. PubMed ID: 17942221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hazardous gas releases in urban areas: assessment of consequences through CFD modelling.
    Pontiggia M, Derudi M, Alba M, Scaioni M, Rota R.
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr 15; 176(1-3):589-96. PubMed ID: 20006427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.