These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism. Kabrhel C, Mark Courtney D, Camargo CA, Moore CL, Richman PB, Plewa MC, Nordenholtz KE, Smithline HA, Beam DM, Brown MD, Kline JA. Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 19298619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV. Arch Intern Med; 2008 Oct 27; 168(19):2131-6. PubMed ID: 18955643 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study. Kabrhel C. J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov 27; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J. Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar 27; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the Wells and Revised Geneva scores for predicting pulmonary embolism. Calisir C, Yavas US, Ozkan IR, Alatas F, Cevik A, Ergun N, Sahin F. Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Feb 27; 16(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18931619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an Australian experience. Wong DD, Ramaseshan G, Mendelson RM. Intern Med J; 2011 Mar 27; 41(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20214691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE-Study Group. Sanson BJ, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, Turkstra F, Prins MH, Büller HR. Thromb Haemost; 2000 Feb 27; 83(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 10739372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of the subjective component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the overall score in emergency department patients. Kabrhel C, McAfee AT, Goldhaber SZ. Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct 27; 12(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 16204134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of the Wells score in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism during hospitalization: a delayed-type cross sectional study in a community hospital. Posadas-Martínez ML, Vázquez FJ, Giunta DH, Waisman GD, de Quirós FG, Gándara E. Thromb Res; 2014 Feb 27; 133(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24342535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Wells score with the simplified revised Geneva score for assessing pretest probability of pulmonary embolism. Penaloza A, Melot C, Motte S. Thromb Res; 2011 Feb 27; 127(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 21094985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical probability of PE: should we use a clinical prediction rule?]. Le Gal G, Righini M, Perrier A. Rev Pneumol Clin; 2008 Dec 27; 64(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 19084205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]