These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 15083082

  • 1. Outcome of patients with nasolacrimal polyurethane stent implantation: do they keep tearing?
    Oztürk S, Konuk O, Ilgit ET, Unal M, Erdem O.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Mar; 20(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 15083082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinicopathologic findings after nasolacrimal polyurethane stent implantations.
    Lee JH, Kang MS, Yang JW.
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 19(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 16491813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults with polyurethane stent.
    Yazici B, Yazici Z, Parlak M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jan; 131(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11162977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with ostial stent intubation following nasolacrimal duct stent incarceration.
    Wang X, Bian Y, Yan W, Daniel P, Tu Y, Wu W.
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jan; 40(12):1185-94. PubMed ID: 25495271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Management of functional epiphora in patients with an anatomically patent dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Shams PN, Chen PG, Wormald PJ, Sloan B, Wilcsek G, McNab A, Selva D.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 132(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 24903661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical efficacy of the polyurethane stent without fluoroscopic guidance in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Lee JS, Jung G, Oum BS, Lee SH, Roh HJ.
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1666-70. PubMed ID: 10964826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The polyurethane nasolacrimal duct stent for lower tear duct obstruction: long-term success rate and complications.
    Schaudig U, Maas R.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Sep; 238(9):733-7. PubMed ID: 11045340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Nasolacrimal stent implantation: report of a case].
    Lunardelli P, Aoki L, Jervásio AC, Zagui RM, Matayoshi S.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008 Sep; 71(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 18408851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Nasolacrimal polyurethane stent placement: preliminary results.
    Perena MF, Castillo J, Medrano J, De Gregorio MA, Loras E, Cristobal JA.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 11(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11284481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study.
    Longari F, Dehgani Mobaraki P, Ricci AL, Lapenna R, Cagini C, Ricci G.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 273(8):2079-84. PubMed ID: 26732693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endoscopic-assisted retrieval of retained lacrimal stent material in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction without dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Ng DS, Chan E, Tong FM, Chow SK, Ko ST.
    Orbit; 2016 Aug; 35(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 26838355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M, Luk A, Wong BW, Young A.
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):2139-45. PubMed ID: 23672972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center.
    Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1463-8. PubMed ID: 15953636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Treatment of complete obstruction of the nasolacrimal system by temporary placement of nasolacrimal polyurethane stents: preliminary results.
    Paúl L, Pinto I, Vicente JM.
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Nov; 58(11):876-82. PubMed ID: 14581012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with polyurethane stent placement: long-term results.
    Yazici Z, Yazici B, Parlak M, Tuncel E, Ertürk H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 12130461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent.
    Yeon JY, Shim WS.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 132 Suppl 1():S77-81. PubMed ID: 22384944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Surgical success rate comparison in functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction: simple lacrimal stent versus endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Cho WK, Paik JS, Yang SW.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 270(2):535-40. PubMed ID: 22566177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H.
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jun; 105(6):1106-13. PubMed ID: 9627664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Insertion of a preloaded Monoka™ stent for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction: Intraoperative observations. A preliminary study.
    Fayet B, Racy E, Katowitz J, Katowitz W, Ruban JM, Brémond-Gignac D.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2019 Mar; 42(3):248-254. PubMed ID: 30871792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Treatment of complete and partial obstruction of the nasolacrimal system with polyurethane stents: initial experience.
    Pulido-Duque JM, Reyes R, Carreira JM, Vega F, Górriz E, Pardo MD, Perez F, Maynar M.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998 Mar; 21(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9473545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.