These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 15090065

  • 1. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
    Povoski SP.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr 16; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul 16; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
    Karanlik H, Kurul S.
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep 01; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
    Povoski SP.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug 01; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A modified internal jugular vein access for long-term catheter placement in cancer patients.
    Pires e Albuquerque M.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 01; 14(2):937-41. PubMed ID: 17103072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible.
    Lin YC, Chu CH, Ou KW, Chan DC, Hsieh CB, Chen TW, Hsu HM, Yu JC.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb 01; 25(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 20926248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown.
    Iorio O, Gazzanelli S, D'Ermo G, Pezzolla A, Gurrado A, Testini M, De Toma G, Cavallaro G.
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun 01; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
    Ayadi S, Ksantini R, Maghrebi H, Daghfous A, Ayadi M, Fteriche F, Bedioui H, Chebbi F, Amous A, Jouini M, Kacem M, Mezlini A, Ben Safta Z.
    Tunis Med; 2011 Jun 01; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Kamat A, Kramer P, Soisson AP.
    W V Med J; 2002 Jun 01; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
    Chang HM, Hsieh HF, Hsu SD, Liao GS, Lin CH, Hsieh CB, Yu JC.
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 01; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Furihata M, Nakagawa A, Kubota K.
    Eur Surg Res; 2008 Feb 01; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G, Finco C, Parise P, Savastano S, Vecchiato M, Degregori S, Merigliano S.
    Chir Ital; 2004 Feb 01; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. External Jugular Venous Cutdown versus Percutaneous Technique for Chemoport Insertion in Children: A Comparative Study.
    Radhakrishna V, Radhakrishnan CN, Srinivasa Rao RC, Kireeti G.
    J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg; 2022 Feb 01; 27(2):140-146. PubMed ID: 35937132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
    Staszewicz W, Naiken SP, Mennet A, Meyer J, Righini M, Morel P, Toso C.
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov 01; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
    Kagawa T, Ueyama S, Kobayashi T, Okabayashi H, Kuroda S, Fujiwara T.
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar 01; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.