These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
14. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems. Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A new low dose mammography technique. Chang CH, Sibala JL, Martin NL, Riley RC. Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr 07; 2(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 866902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations. Tsalafoutas OA, Kolovos CA, Tsapaki V, Betsou S, Koliakou E, Maniatis PN, Xenofos S. Health Phys; 2008 Apr 07; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography. Robson KJ, Kotre CJ, Faulkner K. Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar 07; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system. Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Verdun FR. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct 07; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [First results of mammography with a screen film (author's transl)]. Paterok EM, Säbel M, Weishaar J. Strahlentherapie; 1979 Jan 07; 155(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 760273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]