These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 15098882

  • 1. Nighttime call in house vs. out of house: a comparison of obstetric procedure rates.
    Goldberg J, Gopal M, Singhal R, Mitchell C, Culhane J, Webb DA.
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Mar; 49(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 15098882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?
    Ruderman J, Carroll JC, Reid AJ, Murray MA.
    CMAJ; 1993 Feb 01; 148(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 8439912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Resident duty-hour restrictions and their effect on operative experience in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Occhino JA, Hannigan TL, Baggish MS, Gebhart JB.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011 Feb 01; 72(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 21849756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Philadelphia Episiotomy Intervention Study.
    Goldberg J, Purfield P, Roberts N, Lupinacci P, Fagan M, Hyslop T.
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Aug 01; 51(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 16967628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.
    Lin HC, Xirasagar S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan 01; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Episiotomy rates in private vs. resident service deliveries: a comparison.
    Goode KT, Weiss PM, Koller C, Kimmel S, Hess LW.
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Mar 01; 51(3):190-2. PubMed ID: 16674014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians.
    Abenhaim HA, Benjamin A, Koby RD, Kinch RA, Kramer MS.
    CMAJ; 2007 Aug 14; 177(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 17698823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF, Malcoe LH.
    Birth; 2005 Sep 14; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
    Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Liu TC.
    Health Policy Plan; 2006 Jul 14; 21(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 16790455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH, Wang HI, Hsu CS, Su HW, Chen MJ, Lin HC.
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct 09; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Patients presenting with birth plans: a case-control study of delivery outcomes.
    Deering SH, Zaret J, McGaha K, Satin AJ.
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct 09; 52(10):884-7. PubMed ID: 17977160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Payne SM, Snow RJ, Dierker L, Rosenthal GE.
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct 09; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of blood loss during cesarean section and during vaginal delivery with episiotomy].
    Sarfati R, Maréchaud M, Magnin G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Feb 09; 28(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 10394516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Episiotomy use among residents and faculty compared with private practitioners.
    Howden NL, Weber AM, Meyn LA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan 09; 103(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 14704254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V, Vadalkar J, Cely S, Dopwell F, Yoong W.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 Jan 09; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Patient satisfaction with the prenatal care provider and the risk of cesarean delivery.
    Cohen JR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun 09; 192(6):2029-32; discussion 2032-4. PubMed ID: 15970886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Episiotomy practice in a community hospital setting.
    Gossett DR, Dunsmoor Su R.
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct 09; 53(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 19004409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
    Laye MR, Dellinger EH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug 09; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Kinch RA.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct 09; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.
    Kalish RB, McCullough L, Gupta M, Thaler HT, Chervenak FA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun 09; 103(6):1137-41. PubMed ID: 15172844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.