These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 1510047

  • 1. Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms: 2. A comparison of information from implant and anatomic best-fit superimpositions.
    Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn EL, Bravo LA, Curry S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 1510047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms. 1. Osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants.
    Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn EL, Bravo LA, Curry S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 1636630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an "anatomical" method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants.
    Baumrind S, Korn EL, Ben-Bassat Y, West EE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jun; 91(6):463-74. PubMed ID: 3473926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
    Springate SD, Jones AG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements.
    Hägg U, Attström K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1636632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cephalometric superimpositions.
    Gu Y, McNamara JA.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mandibular remodeling after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for prognathism of the mandible.
    Huang CS, de Villa GH, Liou EJ, Chen YR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 16413885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM, Rübendüz M, Akgül AA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mandibular growth in subjects with infraoccluded deciduous molars: a superimposition study.
    Leonardi M, Armi P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Caltabiano M.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):927-34. PubMed ID: 16448233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnostic validity of different gonial angle segmentation for the assessment of mandibular growth direction: A retrospective study.
    Mei H, Feng Q, Wu Y, Li X, Jiang F, Tian N, Li J.
    Ann Anat; 2022 Jun; 242():151912. PubMed ID: 35183708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM, Dieleman MM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Mulder PG, van Neck JW.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Lower molar and incisor displacement associated with mandibular remodeling.
    Baumrind S, Bravo LA, Ben-Bassat Y, Curry S, Korn EL.
    Angle Orthod; 1997 Mar; 67(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 9107373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT, Sakima CG, Melsen B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Combined cephalometric and transcranial radiography of the rat condyle.
    Killiany DM, Johnson ON, Johnston LE.
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 3473951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors with high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging.
    Cevidanes LH, Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, Lederman HM, Amorim L, Scanavini MA, Vigorito JW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16027622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of general facial growth, maxillary and mandibular growth and treatment changes ("Structural analysis").
    Nielsen IL.
    Int Orthod; 2011 Dec; 9(4):388-409. PubMed ID: 22032962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ten-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics: an implant analysis.
    Işeri H, Kişnişci R, Altuğ-Ataç AT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 18675213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a review.
    Shen G, Darendeliler MA.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16420269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA, Carvalho AA, Lenza EB, Lenza MG, Torres HM, Souza JB.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Postsurgical growth changes in the mandible of adolescents with vertical maxillary excess growth pattern.
    Mojdehi M, Buschang PH, English JD, Wolford LM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):106-16. PubMed ID: 11174555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.