These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
95 related items for PubMed ID: 15119711
1. Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Erickson RL, Lambrechts P. Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 15119711 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear simulation of resin composites and the relationship to clinical wear. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Erickson RL, Wilwerding TM. Oper Dent; 2008 Apr; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18435192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 8621046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units. Ramp LC, Broome JC, Ramp MH. Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of thermal cycling on OCA wear of composite restoratives. Yap AU, Wee KE, Teoh SH, Chew CL. Oper Dent; 2001 Nov; 26(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 11504434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-body wear of dental composites under different loads. Marquis PM, Hu X, Shortall AC. Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Nov; 13(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 11203672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The frictional coefficients and associated wear resistance of novel low-shrink resin-based composites. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Pintado MR, Randall RC, Douglas WH. Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 16085304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vivo experiment to test composite resin wear using the Latin-Square analysis. Lang BR, Bloem TJ, Wang RF, Jaarda M, Kowalski CJ. Int J Prosthodont; 1991 Dec; 4(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 1817524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives. Yap AU, Chew CL, Ong LF, Teoh SH. J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 11844037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]