These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

314 related items for PubMed ID: 15119881

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J, Takahashi Y, Lautenschlager EP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
    Hondrum SO.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Universal paradigms for predictable final impressions.
    Vakay RT, Kois JC.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Mar; 26(3):199-200, 202-6; quiz 208-9. PubMed ID: 15813574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Application times for the single-step/double-mix technique for impression materials in clinical practice.
    Rupp F, Saker O, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Engel E.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Mar; 24(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 22146256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C.
    Braz Dent J; 2000 Mar; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I, Marton S, Hegedüs C.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.