These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 15124784

  • 1. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study.
    Bamzahim M, Shi XQ, Angmar-Månsson B.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
    Neuhaus KW, Rodrigues JA, Seemann R, Lussi A.
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Cheng E, Wan V.
    Pediatr Dent; 2003 Jun; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography.
    Kositbowornchai S, Sukanya C, Tidarat T, Chanoggarn T.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Dec; 17(9):2079-84. PubMed ID: 23242816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
    Virajsilp V, Thearmontree A, Aryatawong S, Paiboonwarachat D.
    Pediatr Dent; 2005 Dec; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N, Mohassel AR, Imanimoghaddam M, Moazzami SM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec 01; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E, Sener Y, Botsali MS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2015 Dec 01; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of diagnodent in detection of occlusal caries in children.
    Olmez A, Tuna D, Oznurhan F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 30(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 16937852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study.
    Sridhar N, Tandon S, Rao N.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009 Dec 01; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 19884717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Braga MM, Chiarotti AP, Imparato JC, Mendes FM.
    Braz Oral Res; 2010 Dec 01; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
    Goel A, Chawla HS, Gauba K, Goyal A.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009 Dec 01; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
    Menem R, Barngkgei I, Beiruti N, Al Haffar I, Joury E.
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr 01; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth.
    Lussi A, Francescut P.
    Caries Res; 2003 Apr 01; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.
    Rodrigues JA, Neuhaus KW, Hug I, Stich H, Seemann R, Lussi A.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Apr 01; 35(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 20945748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
    de Souza JF, Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014 Apr 01; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An In Vitro Validation of DIAGNOdent Versus Radiography for the Detection of Caries Underneath Different Types of Restorations.
    Mohamed OS, Almaz SI, Moustafa NR, Ibrahim AA, Hall MA, Karawia I.
    Cureus; 2024 Jul 01; 16(7):e63689. PubMed ID: 39092343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Isayev A, Kurşun S, Yüksel S.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Jul 01; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.