These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 15137289

  • 21. Governmental regulation of medical devices.
    Goodwin G.
    Respir Care; 1988 Apr; 33(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 10315748
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reducing medical errors through reporting, development and training.
    Benson JS.
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000 Apr; 34(6):391-2. PubMed ID: 11191342
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The role of randomized trials in the investigation of rapidly evolving technologies.
    Abel DB, Eikelboom BC, Fogarty TJ, Strandness DE.
    J Endovasc Surg; 1996 May; 3(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8798142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The comparative evaluation of electromedical equipment by the UK health departments.
    Judge G.
    J Med Eng Technol; 1982 May; 6(4):156-7. PubMed ID: 7131528
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. How to select the ideal hematology analyzer.
    Camden TL.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Feb; 25(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 10124009
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Assessment and evaluation of devices: an analysis of organisations providing information of comparative evaluation studies.
    Ilsley AH, Runciman WB.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1988 Feb; 16(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 3364682
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. How to assess new devices.
    McConnell EA.
    Nurs Manage; 1998 Jun; 29(6):59. PubMed ID: 9807435
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Medical technology assessment: the use of the analytic hierarchy process as a tool for multidisciplinary evaluation of medical devices.
    Hummel JM, van Rossum W, Verkerke GJ, Rakhorst G.
    Int J Artif Organs; 2000 Nov; 23(11):782-7. PubMed ID: 11132023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Life in the slow lane at the FDA.
    Wagner M.
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Feb 01; 23(5):35-6, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10123705
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The limited state of technology assessment for medical devices: facing the issues.
    Ramsey SD, Luce BR, Deyo R, Franklin G.
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep 25; 4 Spec No():SP188-99. PubMed ID: 10185994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Quality care. Top 10 questions to ask before purchasing products.
    Zygowicz W.
    JEMS; 2012 Nov 25; 37(11):66, 68. PubMed ID: 23718098
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Medical devices--establishment of procedures to make a device a banned device: final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 May 18; 44(98):29213-24. PubMed ID: 10241579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.