These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

503 related items for PubMed ID: 15139640

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB, Jin SH, Carney AE, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
    Jin SH, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug 13; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug 13; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Jürgens T.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM, Collins LM, Throckmorton CS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun 30; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jun 30; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B, Buchholz JM, Morgan C, Sharma M, Weller T, Konganda SA, Shirai K, Kawano A.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jun 30; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB, Moore AN.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Jun 30; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH, Donaldson GS, Kong YY.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jun 30; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P, Gaudrain E, Başkent D.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct 30; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug 30; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH, Smith ZM.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Aug 30; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP, Opie JM, Montoya DY.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun 30; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan 30; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.