These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


643 related items for PubMed ID: 15149396

  • 1. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Pérez-Figueroa A, Fernández B, Fernández J, Caballero A.
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analysis of the biases in the estimation of deleterious mutation parameters from natural populations at mutation-selection balance.
    Caballero A.
    Genet Res; 2006 Dec; 88(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 17371612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    García-Dorado A, Monedero JL, López-Fanjul C.
    Genetica; 1998 Dec; 102-103(1-6):255-65. PubMed ID: 9720284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Swindell WR, Bouzat JL.
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):762-7. PubMed ID: 16739457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T, Knowles LL.
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Demontis D, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V, Mikkelsen K, Axelsson T, Kristensen TN.
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Inferences on genome-wide deleterious mutation rates in inbred populations of Drosophila and mice.
    Caballero A, Keightley PD.
    Genetica; 1998 Nov; 102-103(1-6):229-39. PubMed ID: 9720282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Consequences of selection in highly inbred Drosophila strains].
    Iovleva OV, Myl'nikov SV.
    Genetika; 2007 Oct; 43(10):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18069337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The build up of mutation-selection- drift balance in laboratory Drosophila populations.
    García-Dorado A, Avila V, Sánchez-Molano E, Manrique A, López-Fanjul C.
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):653-65. PubMed ID: 17348928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Directed character of genetic variation during long-term selection of Drosophila melanogaster strains for adaptively important characters].
    Kaĭdanov LZ, Myl'nikov SV, Iovleva OV, Galkin AP.
    Genetika; 1994 Aug; 30(8):1085-96. PubMed ID: 7995513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability.
    Rosa JM, Camacho S, García-Dorado A.
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 16033587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila- effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components.
    Kristensen TN, Sørensen AC, Sorensen D, Pedersen KS, Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V.
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 16033547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters.
    Lande R.
    Genetics; 1977 Jun; 86(2 Pt. 1):485-98. PubMed ID: 407132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment.
    Swindell WR, Bouzat JL.
    Evolution; 2006 May; 60(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16817541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli.
    Kibota TT, Lynch M.
    Nature; 1996 Jun 20; 381(6584):694-6. PubMed ID: 8649513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load.
    Barrett SC, Charlesworth D.
    Nature; 1991 Aug 08; 352(6335):522-4. PubMed ID: 1865906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.
    Haag-Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X, Macaskill S, Halligan DL, Houle D, Charlesworth B, Keightley PD.
    Nature; 2007 Jan 04; 445(7123):82-5. PubMed ID: 17203060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model.
    Ronce O, Shaw FH, Rousset F, Shaw RG.
    Evolution; 2009 Jul 04; 63(7):1807-19. PubMed ID: 19473406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Genetic architecture of two fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster: ovariole number and thorax length.
    Telonis-Scott M, McIntyre LM, Wayne ML.
    Genetica; 2005 Nov 04; 125(2-3):211-22. PubMed ID: 16247693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Selection on viability of individuals heterozygous for the temperature-sensitive lethal mutation l(2)M167(DTS) in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster].
    Kulikov AM, Marec F, Mitrofanov VG.
    Genetika; 2005 Jun 04; 41(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 16080600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.