These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


266 related items for PubMed ID: 15149830

  • 1. Tuning properties of radial phantom motion aftereffects.
    Price NS, Greenwood JA, Ibbotson MR.
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1971-9. PubMed ID: 15149830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Local and global motion after-effects are both enhanced in migraine, and the underlying mechanisms differ across cortical areas.
    Shepherd AJ.
    Brain; 2006 Jul; 129(Pt 7):1833-43. PubMed ID: 16684787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings.
    Shioiri S, Matsumiya K.
    J Vis; 2009 May 29; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Centrifugal propagation of motion adaptation effects across visual space.
    McGraw PV, Roach NW.
    J Vis; 2008 Aug 05; 8(11):1.1-11. PubMed ID: 18831595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Topography of the motion aftereffect with and without eye movements.
    Ezzati A, Golzar A, Afraz AS.
    J Vis; 2008 Dec 18; 8(14):23.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM, Ciaramitaro VM, Arman AC.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep 18; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects.
    von Grünau M, Dubé S.
    Spat Vis; 1992 Sep 18; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 1486063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Type of featural attention differentially modulates hMT+ responses to illusory motion aftereffects.
    Castelo-Branco M, Kozak LR, Formisano E, Teixeira J, Xavier J, Goebel R.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov 18; 102(5):3016-25. PubMed ID: 19710372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A model of encoding and decoding in V1 and MT accounts for motion perception anisotropies in the human visual system.
    Rokem A, Silver MA.
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov 24; 1299():3-16. PubMed ID: 19595992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The role of stationary and dynamic test patterns in rapid forms of motion after-effect.
    Pavan A, Skujevskis M.
    J Vis; 2013 Jan 09; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 23302213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Illusory percepts of moving patterns due to discrete temporal sampling.
    Simpson WA, Shahani U, Manahilov V.
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Feb 25; 375(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15664116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.