These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
328 related items for PubMed ID: 15172271
1. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations. Bonde P, Graham AN, MacGowan SW. Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):2076-82. PubMed ID: 15172271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Andreasen JJ, Nekrasas V, Dethlefsen C. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 18508277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth KJ, MacPherson C, Ali IM, Hirsch GM, Ali IS. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 20103309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG -- a randomized, prospective trial. Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Mäder M, Seiffert B, Hoerstrup SP, Zünd G, Genoni M, Turina MI. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jun; 50(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 12077689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 15746730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of less invasive method for saphenous vein harvest in patients with type II diabetes. Nasso G, Anselmi A, De Filippo CM, Modugno P, Canosa C, Spatuzza P, Testa N, Guerrieri MW, Calvo E, Alessandrini F. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Jul; 8(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 17568284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Wang S, Tang H, Wilkinson V, Lukat T, Gelfand ET, Koshal A, Modry DL, Mullen JC, Hao C, Finegan BA. Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of efforts to decrease costly leg wound complications in the medicare population following coronary revascularization. Brandt CP, Greene GC, Pollard TR, Hall WC, Bufkin BL, Briggs RM, Harville LE, Maggart ML, Ware RE. Heart Surg Forum; 2003 Jun; 6(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 12928211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]