These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 15180195

  • 1. Validity and reliability of the neonatal skin condition score.
    Lund CH, Osborne JW.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2004; 33(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 15180195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Neonatal skin care: clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.
    Lund CH, Osborne JW, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2001; 30(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11277161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neonatal skin care: evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses/National Association of Neonatal Nurses.
    Lund CH, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA, Thomas KK.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2001; 30(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11277160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale for predicting skin breakdown in neonates.
    Huffines B, Logsdon MC.
    Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 20(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 9423386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skin protection and breakdown in the ELBW infant. A national survey.
    Maguire DP.
    Clin Nurs Res; 1999 Aug; 8(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 10887872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Skin care product evaluation in a group of critically ill, premature neonates: a descriptive study.
    Young DL, Chakravarthy D, Drower E, Reyna R.
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014 Aug; 41(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 25377101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of Validity and Reliability of a Revised Incontinence-Associated Skin Damage Severity Instrument (IASD.D.2) by 3 Groups of Nursing Staff.
    Bliss DZ, Gurvich OV, Hurlow J, Cefalu JE, Gannon A, Wilhems A, Wiltzen KR, Gannon E, Lee H, Borchert K, Trammel SH.
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018 Aug; 45(5):449-455. PubMed ID: 30188393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.
    Kottner J, Dassen T, Tannen A.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 18986650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J.
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan 01; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
    García-Molina P, Balaguer López E, Verdú J, Nolasco A, García Fernández FP.
    J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep 01; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A protocol for the use of amorphous hydrogel to support wound healing in neonatal patients: an adjunct to nursing skin care.
    Cisler-Cahill L.
    Neonatal Netw; 2006 Sep 01; 25(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 16913237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Skin breakdown in acute care pediatrics.
    Suddaby EC, Barnett S, Facteau L.
    Pediatr Nurs; 2005 Sep 01; 31(2):132-8, 148. PubMed ID: 15934568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Neonatal intravenous extravasation injuries: evaluation of a wound care protocol.
    Sawatzky-Dickson D, Bodnaryk K.
    Neonatal Netw; 2006 Sep 01; 25(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16514862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Newborn clinical outcomes of the AWHONN late preterm infant research-based practice project.
    Medoff Cooper B, Holditch-Davis D, Verklan MT, Fraser-Askin D, Lamp J, Santa-Donato A, Onokpise B, Soeken KL, Bingham D.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012 Sep 01; 41(6):774-85. PubMed ID: 22861492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A survey of skin care practices for premature low birth weight infants.
    Munson KA, Bare DE, Hoath SB, Visscher MO.
    Neonatal Netw; 1999 Apr 01; 18(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10418434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Neonatal skin care: the scientific basis for practice.
    Lund C, Kuller J, Lane A, Lott JW, Raines DA.
    Neonatal Netw; 1999 Jun 01; 18(4):15-27. PubMed ID: 10633681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. SIRA+P: Development and Testing.
    Foster KL, Bergerhofer LD, Smith JB, Fix MM, Olney A, Sherman A.
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2017 Jun 01; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28094094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pressure ulcer risk: audit findings.
    Bick D, Stephens F.
    Nurs Stand; 2017 Jun 01; 17(44):63-6, 68, 70 passim. PubMed ID: 12889395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neonatal thermal care, part I: Survey of temperature probe practices.
    Blackburn S, DePaul D, Loan LA, Marbut K, Taquino LT, Thomas KA, Wilson SK.
    Neonatal Netw; 2001 Apr 01; 20(3):15-8. PubMed ID: 12144210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reliability and validity testing of three breastfeeding assessment tools.
    Riordan JM, Koehn M.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1997 Apr 01; 26(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9087902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.