These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 15180664

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bayesian sample-size determination for inference on two binomial populations with no gold standard classifier.
    Stamey JD, Seaman JW, Young DM.
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct 15; 24(19):2963-76. PubMed ID: 16007574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard.
    Black MA, Craig BA.
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep 30; 21(18):2653-69. PubMed ID: 12228883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. On the interpretation of test sensitivity in the two-test two-population problem: assumptions matter.
    Johnson WO, Gardner IA, Metoyer CN, Branscum AJ.
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct 01; 91(2-4):116-21. PubMed ID: 19651450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimating disease prevalence in a Bayesian framework using probabilistic constraints.
    Berkvens D, Speybroeck N, Praet N, Adel A, Lesaffre E.
    Epidemiology; 2006 Mar 01; 17(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16477254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J, Boelaert M, Lesaffre E.
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep 30; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sample size determination for estimation of the accuracy of two conditionally independent tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO, Gardner IA.
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Sep 30; 71(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 16076507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
    Su CL, Gardner IA, Johnson WO.
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul 30; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
    Hawkins DM, Garrett JA, Stephenson B.
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul 15; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Li J, Fine J.
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug 30; 23(16):2537-50. PubMed ID: 15287083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H, Nie L, Cole SR, Poole C.
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug 15; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.