These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
202 related items for PubMed ID: 15180668
1. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard. Albert PS, Dodd LE. Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 15180668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Qu Y, Tan M, Kutner MH. Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy. Yang I, Becker MP. Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 9290225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study. Menten J, Boelaert M, Lesaffre E. Stat Med; 2008 Sep 30; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study. Keddie SH, Baerenbold O, Keogh RH, Bradley J. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar 10; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard? Spencer BD. Biometrics; 2012 Jun 10; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs. Albert PS. Biometrics; 2007 Sep 10; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance. Pepe MS, Janes H. Biostatistics; 2007 Apr 10; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement errors in caries diagnosis: some further latent class models. Formann AK. Biometrics; 1994 Sep 10; 50(3):865-71. PubMed ID: 7981408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Xu H, Craig BA. Biometrics; 2009 Dec 10; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple binary indicators of latent classes. Larsen K. Biometrics; 2004 Mar 10; 60(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 15032777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects. Goetghebeur E, Liinev J, Boelaert M, Van der Stuyft P. Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun 10; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown. van Smeden M, Oberski DL, Reitsma JB, Vermunt JK, Moons KG, de Groot JA. J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun 10; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard. Albert PS. Biometrics; 2007 Jun 10; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Random effects models for assessing diagnostic accuracy of traditional Chinese doctors in absence of a gold standard. Wang Z, Zhou XH. Stat Med; 2012 Mar 30; 31(7):661-71. PubMed ID: 21626532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements. Espeland MA, Handelman SL. Biometrics; 1989 Jun 30; 45(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 2765639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation. Albert PS, Dodd LE. J Am Stat Assoc; 2008 Mar 01; 103(481):61-73. PubMed ID: 19802353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard. Toft N, Jørgensen E, Højsgaard S. Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr 01; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]