These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1023 related items for PubMed ID: 15182406

  • 1. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
    Tse E, Knaus R.
    Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charité Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte.
    Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R, Hege C, Roigas J, Wille A, Jung K, Kristiansen G, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Deger S.
    Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1278-82; discussion 1283-4. PubMed ID: 16846677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.
    Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ.
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2101-8. PubMed ID: 11696715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases.
    Brown JA, Rodin D, Lee B, Dahl DM.
    Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 15708046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality.
    Touijer K, Guillonneau B.
    Eur Urol; 2006 Apr; 49(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 16488072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
    Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Grande S, Morra I, Scarpa RM.
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years' follow-up in a "second generation center".
    Galli S, Simonato A, Bozzola A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Scaburri A, Gaboardi F.
    Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 16519991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G.
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T.
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG.
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG, Saint F, de La Taille A, Cicco A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC.
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002 Sep; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique.
    Curto F, Benijts J, Pansadoro A, Barmoshe S, Hoepffner JL, Mugnier C, Piechaud T, Gaston R.
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 16413102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases.
    Brown JA, Rodin DM, Lee B, Dahl DM.
    J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):442-5. PubMed ID: 15643198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Improve recovery of urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a clinical report of 51 cases].
    Ma LL, Hong K, Huang Y, Wang GL, Xiao CL, Lu J, Tian XJ.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec 15; 46(24):1882-4. PubMed ID: 19134376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.
    Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann O, Rassweiler J.
    Eur Urol; 2004 Sep 15; 46(3):312-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 15306100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.