These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


594 related items for PubMed ID: 15195725

  • 1. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA, Hilton TJ, Reagan SE.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Jun; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD, Vance RI.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A, Summitt JB.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
    Ahrari F, Nojoomian M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct 14; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.