These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 15198227

  • 1. Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria.
    Greenberg CB, Davidson EB, Bellmer DD, Morton RJ, Payton ME.
    Am J Vet Res; 2004 Jun; 65(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 15198227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro loss of tensile strength and elasticity of five absorbable suture materials in sterile and infected canine urine.
    Schiller TD, Stone EA, Gupta BS.
    Vet Surg; 1993 Jun; 22(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 8362503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tensile Comparison of Polydioxanone, Polyglyconate, and Barbed Glycolide-Trimethylene Carbonate Suture in Canine Cadaveric Tensor Fascia Lata.
    Shimizu N, Tarlton J, Friend E, Doran I, Parsons K.
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27906473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, D'Angelo D.
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E, McPherson N, Grant A.
    J Surg Educ; 2009 Mar; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM, Kidd CE, Mulon PY, Zhu X.
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA, Chegini N, Masterson BJ.
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R, Van Rijssel EJ.
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
    Tanaka Y, Sadahiro S, Ishikawa K, Suzuki T, Kamijo A, Tazume S, Yasuda M.
    Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between tensile characteristics of various suture materials with two suture techniques: an in vitro study.
    Taysi AE, Ercal P, Sismanoglu S.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6393-6401. PubMed ID: 33851242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL, Sedaghati T, Seifalian AM, Kang N.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro comparison of the properties of polydioxanone, polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures in sterile and infected urine.
    el-Mahrouky A, McElhaney J, Bartone FF, King L.
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):913-5. PubMed ID: 2821292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F.
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM, Meyer DC, Favre P, Gerber C.
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE, Patterson JA, Kamath R, Willett G, Ahmed SW, Butterfield AB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mechanical performance of monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Rodeheaver GT, Powell TA, Thacker JG, Edlich RF.
    Am J Surg; 1987 Nov; 154(5):544-7. PubMed ID: 3118727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preclinical evaluation of PDS (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable suture vs chromic surgical gut in urologic surgery.
    Cohen EL, Kirschenbaum A, Glenn JF.
    Urology; 1987 Oct; 30(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 3116740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.