These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 1520050

  • 1. Effectiveness and efficiency of selective vs universal screening for chlamydial infection in sexually active young women.
    Sellors JW, Pickard L, Gafni A, Goldsmith CH, Jang D, Mahony JB, Chernesky MA.
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Sep; 152(9):1837-44. PubMed ID: 1520050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE, Wu O, Twaddle S, Macmillan S, McMillan L, Templeton A, McKenzie H, Noone A, Allardice G, Reid M.
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
    Mayaud P, Grosskurth H, Changalucha J, Todd J, West B, Gabone R, Senkoro K, Rusizoka M, Laga M, Hayes R.
    Bull World Health Organ; 1995 Nov; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonurban family planning clinics in Wisconsin.
    Addiss DG, Vaughn ML, Holzhueter MA, Bakken LL, Davis JP.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1987 Nov; 19(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 3436412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC.
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women attending a family planning clinic: the need for a screening service.
    Tschanz DW, Keely DF.
    J S C Med Assoc; 1986 Feb; 82(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 3485737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Genital Chlamydia infections in sexually active female adolescents: do we really need to screen everyone?
    Mosure DJ, Berman S, Fine D, DeLisle S, Cates W, Boring JR.
    J Adolesc Health; 1997 Jan; 20(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 9007653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Universal screening or prophylactic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women seeking induced abortions: which strategy is more cost-effective?
    Chen S, Li J, van den Hoek A.
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Apr; 34(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 17414068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ, Welte R, van den Hoek JA, van Doornum GJ, Coutinho RA, Jager JC.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar 27; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
    Gift TL, Gaydos CA, Kent CK, Marrazzo JM, Rietmeijer CA, Schillinger JA, Dunne EF.
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov 27; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of sexually transmitted diseases diagnostic algorithms among family planning clients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
    Kapiga SH, Vuylsteke B, Lyamuya EF, Dallabetta G, Laga M.
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Jun 27; 74 Suppl 1():S132-8. PubMed ID: 10023364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Risk scores to detect cervical infections in urban antenatal clinic attenders in Mwanza, Tanzania.
    Mayaud P, Uledi E, Cornelissen J, ka-Gina G, Todd J, Rwakatare M, West B, Kopwe L, Manoko D, Grosskurth H, Hayes R, Mabey D.
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Jun 27; 74 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 10023365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Selective screening for chlamydial infection in women: a comparison of three sets of criteria.
    Marrazzo JM, Fine D, Celum CL, DeLisle S, Handsfield HH.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997 Jun 27; 29(4):158-62. PubMed ID: 9258646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Chlamydial infection in a population of Ethiopian women attending obstetric, gynaecological and mother and child health clinics.
    Duncan ME, Jamil Y, Tibaux G, Pelzer A, Mehari L, Darougar S.
    Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Jan 27; 42(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8868379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
    Davies HD, Wang EE.
    CMAJ; 1996 Jun 01; 154(11):1631-44. PubMed ID: 8646651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
    Nyári T, Mészáros G, Deák J, Nagy E, Kovács L.
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul 02; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: prevalence and determinants among women presenting for routine gynecologic examination.
    Massé R, Laperrière H, Rousseau H, Lefebvre J, Remis RS.
    CMAJ; 1991 Oct 15; 145(8):953-61. PubMed ID: 1913429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural South African women.
    Schneider H, Coetzee DJ, Fehler HG, Bellingan A, Dangor Y, Radebe F, Ballard RC.
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Jun 15; 74 Suppl 1():S147-52. PubMed ID: 10023366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics.
    Trachtenberg AI, Washington AE, Halldorson S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan 15; 71(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 3122137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.