These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 15203616

  • 1. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
    Shetty A, Livingston I, Acharya S, Templeton A.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F, Zwizwai M, Nyström L, Lindmark G.
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002 Apr; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
    Kho EM, Sadler L, McCowan L.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A, Livingstone I, Acharya S, Rice P, Danielian P, Templeton A.
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
    Khan ZA, Abdul B, Majoko F.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Obstetric outcomes after cervical ripening by multiple doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2.
    Chan LY, Fu L, Leung TN, Wong SF, Lau TK.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Jan; 83(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 14678088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S, Mitra SN, Banerjee PK, Biswas PK, Bhattacharyya S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following additional doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ayaz H, Black M, Madhuvrata P, Shetty A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct 01; 170(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 23932182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S, Waterstone M, Norman I, Murrells T.
    BJOG; 2005 Apr 01; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
    Nanda S, Singhal SR, Papneja A.
    Trop Doct; 2007 Jan 01; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women.
    Zamzami TY.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec 01; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Induced labor with prostaglandins: 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel versus 3 mg PGE2 vaginal tablet].
    Müller T, Rempen A.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995 Dec 01; 199(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7725767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA, Al-Bar HM, Archibong EI.
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug 01; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug 01; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A multi-centre audit on the use of vaginal prostaglandin for the induction of labour.
    Selo-Ojeme D, Lawal O, Nayar B, IMA Study Group.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul 01; 28(5):501-3. PubMed ID: 18850423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 gel, prostaglandin E2 pessary and extra-amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin for induction of labour.
    Qamar S, Bashir A, Ibrar F.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012 Jul 01; 24(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 24397044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intravaginal prostaglandin-E2 for cervical priming and induction of labour.
    Al-Taani MI.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2007 Jul 01; 13(4):855-61. PubMed ID: 17955768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
    Grignaffini A, Soncini E, Anfuso S, Ronzoni E.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct 01; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.