These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
236 related items for PubMed ID: 15204140
1. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Vu KP, Proctor RW. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility. Proctor RW, Wang H, Vu KP. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Koch I. Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses. Proctor RW, Cho YS. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B, Notebaert W, Vandierendonck A. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment. Yamaguchi M, Proctor RW. J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Proctor RW, Cho YS. Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 132(3):416-42. PubMed ID: 16719568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: a brain potential analysis. Mansfield KL, van der Molen MW, van Boxtel GJ. Psychophysiology; 2012 Jun; 49(6):756-69. PubMed ID: 22524194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of response selection in sequence learning. Deroost N, Soetens E. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 16627348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location. Valle-Inclán F, Sohn F, Redondo M. Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility]. Kleinsorge T. Z Exp Psychol; 1999 Mar; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes. Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Arning K, Proctor RW. Am J Psychol; 2009 Mar; 122(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19827702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS. Koski L, Molnar-Szakacs I, Iacoboni M. Neuroimage; 2005 Jan 15; 24(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 15627572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses. Kaneko H, Tamura H, Kawashima T, Suzuki SS. Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov 01; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]