These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


199 related items for PubMed ID: 15204325

  • 1. Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
    Wade JB, DeMatteo D, Hart RP.
    Brain Inj; 2004 Jul; 18(7):629-43. PubMed ID: 15204325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Traumatic brain injury and forensic neuropsychology.
    Bigler ED, Brooks M.
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009 Jul; 24(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 19333063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J, Lin JR.
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME, Price BH, Levin L, Edersheim JG.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018 Jul; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
    Bush SS, NAN Policy & Planning Committee.
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Dec; 20(8):997-1007. PubMed ID: 16076547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL, Mixon L, Jackson M, Shook J.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015 Dec; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
    Kulich R, Maciewicz R, Scrivani SJ.
    Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Ruff R.
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 24(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 19333068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML, Murray CI, Richardson JT.
    Behav Sci Law; 2008 Mar; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology.
    Johnson-Greene D, Bechtold KT.
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 11992232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Forensic Neuropsychology: are we there yet?
    Hom J.
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 18(8):827-45. PubMed ID: 14609579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Forensic neuropsychology and expert witness testimony: An overview of forensic practice.
    Leonard EL.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015 Dec; 42-43():177-82. PubMed ID: 26409570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion?
    Echemendia RJ, Herring S, Bailes J.
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 May; 43 Suppl 1():i32-5. PubMed ID: 19433423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. SLAM on the stand: how the sports-related concussion literature can inform the expert witness.
    Bailey CM, Barth JT, Bender SD.
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009 May; 24(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 19333067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Neuropsychologist Experts and Civil Capacity Evaluations: Representative Cases.
    Kaufmann PM.
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 31(6):487-94. PubMed ID: 27538441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001 Sep; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D.
    J Oral Implantol; 2002 Sep; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP, Cecil JS.
    JAMA; 2002 Sep 18; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.