These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

462 related items for PubMed ID: 1520444

  • 1. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Bosser MJ, Nafso AJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Brown JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B, Heath JR.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep 01; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR, Nguyen T, Boyle AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov 01; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T.
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991 Nov 01; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA, Vermilyea SG, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec 01; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun 01; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ, Setchell DJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec 01; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug 01; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A, Land MF, Wandling C, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep 01; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep 01; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of bonding agents on the bond strengths of facial silicone elastomers to a visible light-activated resin.
    Polyzois GL, Frangou MJ, Andreopoulos AG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991 Sep 01; 4(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 1811638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Litaker M.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008 Sep 01; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan 01; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM, Elgendy MN, Kashef NA, Halim MM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan 01; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA, Talic YF.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar 01; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I.
    Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW, White SN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May 01; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.