These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
200 related items for PubMed ID: 15204678
1. Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI. Ren SS, Sun GH, Ku CH, Chen DC, Wu GJ. Arch Androl; 2004; 50(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 15204678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three sperm preparation media. Sharma RK, Seifarth K, Garlak D, Agarwal A. Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility. Shibahara H, Obara H, Ayustawati, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Ohno A, Takamizawa S, Suzuki M. Int J Androl; 2004 Apr; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15149462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value of CASA parameters in IUI with frozen donor sperm. Freour T, Jean M, Mirallie S, Langlois ML, Dubourdieu S, Barriere P. Int J Androl; 2009 Oct; 32(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 18399982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Separation of high-quality sperm by PureSperm centrifugation applied to intrauterine insemination cycles]. Zhang Y, Qian Y, Feng T, Cai L, Liu J. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 May; 10(5):348-50. PubMed ID: 15190826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization. Bollendorf A, Check JH, Lurie D. J Androl; 1996 May; 17(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 8957699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column. Matsuoka I, Fujino Y, Ito F, Koh B, Kojima T, Ogita S. J Reprod Med; 1995 May; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation of cryopreserved human semen using Sephadex columns, washing, or Percoll gradients. Drobnis EZ, Zhong CQ, Overstreet JW. J Androl; 1991 May; 12(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1655686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effects of Percoll and PureSperm on the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) semen. Hernández-López L, Umland N, Mondragón-Ceballos R, Nayudu PL. J Med Primatol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 15860114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated morphophysiological assessment of two methods for sperm selection in bovine embryo production in vitro. Cesari A, Kaiser GG, Mucci N, Mutto A, Vincenti A, Fornés MW, Alberio RH. Theriogenology; 2006 Sep 15; 66(5):1185-93. PubMed ID: 16647751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of sperm preparation using double-gradients technique study in Siriraj Hospital. Petyim S, Choavaratana R, Suksompong S, Laokirkkiat P, Makemaharn O. J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jul 15; 92(7):878-84. PubMed ID: 19626804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Percoll wash on sperm motion parameters and subsequent fertility in intrauterine insemination cycles. Swanson ML, Collins JM, Freiman SF, Dubin NH. J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Jan 15; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 7580010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of single- and two-layer Percoll separation for selection of motile spermatozoa. Sharma RK, Seifarth K, Agarwal A. Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1997 Jan 15; 42(6):412-7. PubMed ID: 9459085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between a two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradient and swim-up for sperm preparation on normal and abnormal semen samples. Chen SU, Ho HN, Chen HF, Chao KH, Lin HR, Huang SC, Lee TY, Yang YS. J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov 15; 12(10):698-703. PubMed ID: 8624426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Techniques of sperm selection and in vitro fertilization results. Leonetti T, Causio F, Cagnazzo G. Acta Eur Fertil; 1995 Nov 15; 26(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8923915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sperm function and choice of preparation media: comparison of Percoll and Accudenz discontinuous density gradients. Sbracia M, Sayme N, Grasso J, Vigue L, Huszar G. J Androl; 1996 Nov 15; 17(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8833742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Ricci G, Perticarari S, Boscolo R, Montico M, Guaschino S, Presani G. Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb 15; 91(2):632-8. PubMed ID: 18206147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the methods of separating high-quality sperm for intrauterine insemination]. She H, Dong NJ, Yuan YY. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Nov 15; 14(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 19102502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency of discontinuous Percoll gradients preparation for selection of motile sperm from poor quality semens. Sukcharoen N. J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Dec 15; 77(12):633-8. PubMed ID: 7759973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Separation of spermatozoa using Percoll gradients: value for in vitro fertilization]. Mathieu C, Guérin JF, Gille Y, Pinatel MC, Lornage J, Boulieu D. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988 Dec 15; 17(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 3385161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]