These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


240 related items for PubMed ID: 15212074

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA.
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA.
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Baby contracts.
    Kwok CS.
    Yale Law J; 2001 May; 110(7):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12741373
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA.
    Ohio State Law J; 1990 May; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations.
    Petersen SD.
    UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes.
    Waldman E.
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
    Crockin SL.
    Fam Law Q; 2005 Jun; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.