These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents. Waldman EA. Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo. Cuva AJ. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no. Sieck WA. Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations. Petersen SD. UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes. Waldman E. Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics. Crockin SL. Fam Law Q; 2005 Jun; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]