These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 15212199

  • 21. Evaluation of the unstable total hip arthroplasty.
    Hamilton WG, McAuley JP.
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():87-92. PubMed ID: 15116602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M, Tanino H, Abo M, Kakunai S, Banks SA.
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun 03; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
    Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S, Mayr E, Colwell CW, D'Lima DD.
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr 03; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
    Decking J, Gerber A, Kränzlein J, Meurer A, Böhm B, Plitz W.
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004 Apr 03; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X, Kang L, Wang J.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb 03; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G.
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb 03; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
    Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, Shahriari A, Hutton WC.
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997 Feb 03; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K.
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul 03; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.
    Barrack RL.
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003 Jul 03; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Treatments of dislocation after total hip replacement].
    Zhao F, Ma C, Xiong C.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jan 03; 21(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 17304995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of head diameter on passive and active dynamic hip dislocation.
    Bunn A, Colwell CW, D'Lima DD.
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov 03; 32(11):1525-31. PubMed ID: 24961686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB, Wagle RR, Usrey MM, Thompson MT, Incavo SJ, Noble PC.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec 03; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty--the problem is still present, reasons and treatments].
    Pepłoński A, Płomiński J.
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2014 Mar 03; 36(213):151-4. PubMed ID: 24779210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty.
    Bevill SL, Bevill GR, Penmetsa JR, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ.
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec 03; 38(12):2365-74. PubMed ID: 16214484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro.
    Kassi JP, Heller MO, Stoeckle U, Perka C, Duda GN.
    J Biomech; 2005 May 03; 38(5):1143-54. PubMed ID: 15797595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
    Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec 03; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
    Heffernan C, Banerjee S, Nevelos J, Macintyre J, Issa K, Markel DC, Mont MA.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May 03; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM, Galbusera F, Ceroni RG, Raimondi MT.
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar 03; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The Effect Of Increasing Femoral Head Size On The Force Required For Dislocation.
    Dietz MJ, Moushmoush O, Samora WP, Kish VL, Hamlin BR.
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov 10; 35():426-429. PubMed ID: 31282981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.
    Bouchard SM, Stewart KJ, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD.
    J Biomech; 2006 Nov 10; 39(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 16488227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.