These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

109 related items for PubMed ID: 15217597

  • 1. In vitro rat colonic wall imaging with MR endoluminal coil: feasibility study and histologic correlations.
    Pilleul F, Beuf O, Armenean M, Scoazec JY, Valette PJ, Saint-Jalmes H.
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 15217597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vivo colon wall imaging using endoluminal coils: feasibility study on rabbits.
    Beuf O, Pilleul F, Armenean M, Hadour G, Saint-Jalmes H.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 20(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15221813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Experimental testing of a new coil design for endoluminal MRI applied to the pig stomach].
    Grenacher L, Heye T, Kuntz C, Palmowski M, Autschbach F, Manz B, Benecke M, Volke F, Kauffmann GW, Düx M.
    Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):986-91. PubMed ID: 15973601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [High-resolution imaging of the layers of the gastrointestinal wall of pig and human specimens using an endoluminal MR receiver coil: correlation to histology].
    Kramer S, Palmowski M, Macher-Göppinger S, Müller M, Volke F, Düx M, Kauczor HU, Grenacher L.
    Rofo; 2009 Nov; 181(11):1073-80. PubMed ID: 19408212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Morphologic and dynamic renal imaging with assessment of glomerular filtration rate in a pcy-mouse model using a clinical 3.0 Tesla scanner.
    Sadick M, Schock D, Kraenzlin B, Gretz N, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):469-75. PubMed ID: 19465861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. High-resolution MR imaging appearance of colonic tissue in rabbits using an endoluminal coil.
    Pilleul F, Beuf O, Godefroy C, Scoazec JY, Armenean M, Armenean C, Perrin E, Valette PJ, Jalmes HS.
    MAGMA; 2005 Nov; 18(5):238-44. PubMed ID: 16320089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality.
    Saar B, Gschossmann JM, Bonel HM, Kickuth R, Vock P, Netzer P.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [In vitro study of morphology of the bladder wall using MR tomography at 1.0 Tesla: correlation with histology].
    Teufl F, Dammann F, Wehrmann M.
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 9198512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint in dogs and cats. Effect of different coils on image quality].
    Gäbler K, Brühschwein A, Loderstedt S, Oechtering G, Ludewig E.
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011 May; 39(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 22143585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
    Schaefer FK, Kurz B, Schaefer PJ, Fuerst M, Hedderich J, Graessner J, Schuenke M, Heller H.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. High spatial resolution quantitative MR images: an experimental study of dedicated surface coils.
    Gensanne D, Josse G, Lagarde JM, Vincensini D.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun 07; 51(11):2843-55. PubMed ID: 16723770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.
    Koktzoglou I, Chung YC, Mani V, Carroll TJ, Morasch MD, Mizsei G, Simonetti OP, Fayad ZA, Li D.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May 07; 23(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 16555260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Inductively-overcoupled coil design for high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
    Bilgen M.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Jan 09; 5():3. PubMed ID: 16401343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences.
    Fink C, Puderbach M, Biederer J, Fabel M, Dietrich O, Kauczor HU, Reiser MF, Schönberg SO.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun 09; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 17507808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
    Fries P, Runge VM, Kirchin MA, Stemmer A, Naul LG, Wiliams KD, Reith W, Bücker A, Schneider G.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun 09; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Parallel imaging enhanced MR colonography using a phantom model.
    Morrin MM, Pedrosa I, McKenzie CA, Farrell RJ, Bloch N, Solazzo S, Ngo L, Goldberg SN, Rofsky NM.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep 09; 28(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 18777549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Esophageal carcinoma: evaluation with high-resolution three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state MR imaging in vitro.
    Yamada I, Izumi Y, Kawano T, Yoshino N, Tetsumura A, Kumagai J, Shibuya H.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec 09; 24(6):1326-32. PubMed ID: 17083112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [MR imaging of gastric wall layers in vitro: correlation to thehistologic wall structure].
    Lubienski A, Grenacher L, Reith W, Schipp A, Mechtersheimer G, Düx M.
    Rofo; 2002 Apr 09; 174(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 11960414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model.
    Röttgen R, Herzog H, Bogen P, Freund T, Felix R, Bruhn H.
    Clin Imaging; 2006 Apr 09; 30(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 16814140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.