These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

522 related items for PubMed ID: 15219315

  • 1. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
    Gehr DD, Janssen T, Michaelis CE, Deingruber K, Lamm K.
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Janssen T, Niedermeyer HP, Arnold W.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006 Jul; 68(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 17065826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Assessment of outer hair cell function recovery by means of the DPOAE threshold].
    Kummer P, Hotz MA, Arnold W.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jul; Suppl 125():77S-79S. PubMed ID: 11141947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of the individual DPOAE growth behavior on DPOAE level variations caused by conductive hearing loss and elevated intracranial pressure.
    Deppe C, Kummer P, Gürkov R, Olzowy B.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jun; 34(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 22968426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimum primary tone level setting for measuring high amplitude DPOAEs in guinea pigs.
    Michaelis CE, Gehr DD, Deingruber K, Arnold W, Lamm K.
    Hear Res; 2004 Mar; 189(1-2):58-62. PubMed ID: 14987752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss.
    Turcanu D, Dalhoff E, Müller M, Zenner HP, Gummer AW.
    Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 19233253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Marcrum SC, Kummer P, Steffens T.
    Ear Hear; 2017 May; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantitative estimation of minor conductive hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.
    Olzowy B, Deppe C, Arpornchayanon W, Canis M, Strieth S, Kummer P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1845-52. PubMed ID: 20968357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.
    Audiology; 2001 Aug; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of glucocorticoid receptor antagonist on CAPs threshold shift due to short-term sound exposure in guinea pigs.
    Mori T, Fujimura K, Yoshida M, Suzuki H.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15571913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
    Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Zenner HP.
    HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing young humans].
    Dan H, Ni D, Li F.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1998 Jun; 20(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 11367707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Clinical application of distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in presbycusis].
    Nieschalk M, Hustert B.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Mar; 75(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 8652027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.