These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 15220372

  • 1. Evaluation of swab transport systems against a published standard.
    Human RP, Jones GA.
    J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):762-3. PubMed ID: 15220372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Survival of bacteria in swab transport packs.
    Human RP, Jones GA.
    Med Lab Sci; 1986 Jan; 43(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3083187
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of 4 swab transport systems for the recovery of ATCC and clinical strains with characterized resistance mechanisms.
    Morosini MI, Loza E, Gutiérrez O, Almaraz F, Baquero F, Cantón R.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 56(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 16822635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
    Suzuki K, Higuchi T.
    Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Survival of genital mycoplasma on various bacteriological swabs and transport media.
    Busolo F, Baratto T, Bertoloni G, Grossato A.
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1981 Mar; 60(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 7272010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Use of swabs without transport media for the Gen-Probe Group A Strep Direct Test.
    Bourbeau PP, Heiter BJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):3207-11. PubMed ID: 15243083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of two Stuart's liquid swab transport systems tested by the CLSI M40 method.
    Van Horn KG, Rankin I.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Aug; 26(8):583-6. PubMed ID: 17564731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Survival of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates of different auxotypes in six commercial transport systems.
    Graver MA, Wade JJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4803-4. PubMed ID: 15472345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
    Moore G, Griffith C.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of bacteriological transport systems.
    Ederer GM, Christian DL.
    Am J Med Technol; 1975 Aug; 41(8):299-306. PubMed ID: 239597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Easy-Flow Copan Liquid Stuart's and Starplex Swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria.
    Drake C, Barenfanger J, Lawhorn J, Verhulst S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 43(3):1301-3. PubMed ID: 15750099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of three swab transport systems for the maintenance of clinically important bacteria in simulated mono- and polymicrobial samples.
    Tano E, Melhus A.
    APMIS; 2011 Mar; 119(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 21284737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Evaluation of survival of bacteria on dry swabs and transport systems (author's transl)].
    Mandler F, Sfondrini D.
    Ann Sclavo; 1977 Mar; 19(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 356768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.